<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments for Travel Signposts Photo</title> <atom:link href="http://www.travelsignpostsphoto.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.travelsignpostsphoto.com</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Comment on The War Against Blurry Photos: Using A Monopod by Hugh Sykes</title><link>http://www.travelsignpostsphoto.com/basic-stuff/the-war-against-blurry-photos-using-a-monopod#comment-6</link> <dc:creator>Hugh Sykes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travelsignpostsphoto.com/?p=4#comment-6</guid> <description>Hi TonyI like your advice about monopods. I have found the following tips useful: - You can firm up a monopod by jamming it up against a fence; - A monopod gives you a sense of security in a dodgy location - it would be a useful defender; - A right angle viewer makes one more versatile - you can more easily get a lower viewpoint with one; - I fitted mine with a ball head and found I could then point my camera in all sorts of awkward angles when taking shots of flowers. This gave me much better results than trying to shoot hand-held. A tri-pod would have been better but heavier to carry and much slower to set up; - A monopod is much quicker to set up than a tripod; - A monopod is easy to use at a crowded tourist site, where a tripod would be a trip-hazard; - You only need a simple head for a monopod, saving weight and cost. There is no need to use a quick-release head, which would be a definite asset on a tripod; - Monopods are more acceptable to tourist site security staff than tripods.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony</p><p>I like your advice about monopods. I have found the following tips useful:<br /> &#8211; You can firm up a monopod by jamming it up against a fence;<br /> &#8211; A monopod gives you a sense of security in a dodgy location &#8211; it would be a useful defender;<br /> &#8211; A right angle viewer makes one more versatile &#8211; you can more easily get a lower viewpoint with one;<br /> &#8211; I fitted mine with a ball head and found I could then point my camera in all sorts of awkward angles when taking shots of flowers. This gave me much better results than trying to shoot hand-held. A tri-pod would have been better but heavier to carry and much slower to set up;<br /> &#8211; A monopod is much quicker to set up than a tripod;<br /> &#8211; A monopod is easy to use at a crowded tourist site, where a tripod would be a trip-hazard;<br /> &#8211; You only need a simple head for a monopod, saving weight and cost. There is no need to use a quick-release head, which would be a definite asset on a tripod;<br /> &#8211; Monopods are more acceptable to tourist site security staff than tripods.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The War Against Blurry Photos: Using A Monopod by Tony Page</title><link>http://www.travelsignpostsphoto.com/basic-stuff/the-war-against-blurry-photos-using-a-monopod#comment-4</link> <dc:creator>Tony Page</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:22:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travelsignpostsphoto.com/?p=4#comment-4</guid> <description>Aha! Congratulations, Ron, you&#039;re the first to comment on that! The truth is, the shot didn&#039;t work with the long format and position of the caption, so I flipped it to get a better graphic effect (that carries on to the thumbnail,too). Of course, that wasn&#039;t necessary anywhere else.Sorry to disappoint you, as I presume you&#039;re a lefty!Tony Page ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha! Congratulations, Ron, you&#8217;re the first to comment on that! The truth is, the shot didn&#8217;t work with the long format and position of the caption, so I flipped it to get a better graphic effect (that carries on to the thumbnail,too). Of course, that wasn&#8217;t necessary anywhere else.</p><p>Sorry to disappoint you, as I presume you&#8217;re a lefty!</p><p>Tony Page <img src='http://www.travelsignpostsphoto.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The War Against Blurry Photos: Using A Monopod by Ron</title><link>http://www.travelsignpostsphoto.com/basic-stuff/the-war-against-blurry-photos-using-a-monopod#comment-3</link> <dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.travelsignpostsphoto.com/?p=4#comment-3</guid> <description>Now that I am at this page all is clear. The image of the monopod shot on the main page is reversed. And I was thinking that Nikon had made a left-handed camera.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I am at this page all is clear. The image of the monopod shot on the main page is reversed. And I was thinking that Nikon had made a left-handed camera.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/23 queries in 0.042 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.travelsignpostsphoto.com @ 2012-02-23 16:28:45 -->
